How long should a blog post be?
In the past year, content specialists have cited the benefits of longer blog posts. By longer, they typically mean more than 2,000 words in length.
According to experts, longer posts solve a lot of problems that web owners and small businesses face. Apparently, longer posts can improve your site’s search engine rankings, engage more readers, and generally drive more traffic to your site.
It sounds like the solution to all your problems, right?
Many website owners have jumped on the long blog post bandwagon, some without thinking about it. Are they right in doing so?
In this post, I’ll take a closer look at longer blog posts and their effectiveness. My goal is to provide the information you need to make and informed decision. At the end, I invite you to share your own experiences.
Are Longer Blog Posts Better?
There’s a lot of discussion about blog post length. Let’s take a look at some of the evidence.
First, let’s look at Garrett Moon’s post on the CoSchedule blog, 5 Things That Will Change Your Mind About Long Form Content Marketing. If you read this post carefully, you’ll discover that most articles that rank well in search engines are longer.
Next, let’s look at Neil Patel’s post on the Quick Sprout blog, How Long Should Each Blog Post Be? A Data Driven Answer. An interesting finding from this post is that longer posts get more quality back links.
With the evidence that longer posts can be more effective, you would think that every website owner should be creating longer posts. But, let’s take a the other side of the issue.
Longer Blog Posts Done Wrong
As with any trend, as soon as it becomes popular, people start to do it wrong. And with longer posts, there’s a lot you can do wrong.
Here are some mistakes that I see websites making with longer posts:
- Poor editing. Badly written copy is often longer than well-written copy. Unfortunately, skipping the editing step is not the right way to go about creating a long-form post.
- Lack of formatting. You’ve probably seen these posts too. They’re nothing but paragraph after paragraph of unbroken text. In the worst cases, they are one giant paragraph.
- No real focus. Did you ever start reading a post and think to yourself, “what’s this post about?” That’s because the author hasn’t taken time to establish a direction for the post.
- No images. Along with formatting, images are vital for breaking up large chunks of text. With longer posts, you need more than one image.
- Not targeted. Some posts don’t consider the audience. The author just throws out as much information as he or she can (probably in an attempt to make the post longer) and hope that someone responds.
The bottom line is, no matter how long the post, quality still counts. Length alone is not enough to guarantee a post’s success.
What does all this mean for your website?
Are Longer Posts Right for Your Site?
If you’re reading this post, you’re probably thinking about using longer posts or articles for your website. That’s great. But before you make the jump to longer posts, there are some things you should know.
- Cost. If you pay a writer to create longer posts, be aware that an in-depth post will cost you more. In How Will Freelance Writers Earn Well From Longer Blog Posts? by Carol Tice on Make a Living Writing, she puts the floor (that’s the lowest cost) for writing longer posts at $300.00. Having written longer posts myself, I think that’s a pretty accurate figure.
- Time. One reason that longer posts cost more is that it takes a writer much longer to create one. Don’t believe a writer who says they can whip one out in less than a day. In my experience, a longer post can take several days to research and write. If you plan on doing the writing yourself, you need to ask yourself if you have the time.
- Audience. If your post or article isn’t useful to your target audience, publishing it won’t be worth it for you no matter how many words are in the post. Always, always, always… take time to understand who your audience is and what they need. It takes a little extra effort on your part, but it’s worth it in the long run.
A Happy Compromise
Right now you’re probably thinking “$300 a post. There’s no way I could afford to pay that. I guess I can’t afford longer posts.”
Unless you’re a large publication or big corporation with a huge blogging budget, cost is a legitimate concern.
Fortunately, adding long content to your website is not an either or proposition. As long as it’s relevant to your audience, everything you publish doesn’t need to be longer for your blog to be effective. Consider a compromise.
Let’s say that your budget for blog posts and articles is $800 a month. For that price you’ve hired a writer to create eight original, hiqh-quality posts that average 700 words a piece. That means you publish a post twice a week, which is a pretty good frequency.
If you were to try to publish eight longer form posts, your cost would suddenly triple. That might seem to put long-form posts out of reach. But consider spending your monthly budget like this:
- Five well-written shorter posts at $100 each
- One top-notch long-form post at $300
- One short announcement written by you or your team at no cost.
With this compromise, you can still publish one long-form post a month. By the end of the year, your site will have 12 long-form posts. On the weeks you don’t publish a long-form posts, you publish two high-quality shorter posts or you publish an announcement and a shorter post.
(Note: Added 4/19/2014. The post prices above are intended merely as an example of how a budget could be reconfigured to include a longer post. They are not necessarily recommended prices for such a project, nor do they reflect what I charge for such a project.)
Your Turn
A high-quality shorter post can still be extremely effective in reaching your target audience. It will certainly be more effective than a poorly written longer post.
You don’t have to choose between long and short content. Your website can have both. With the right compromise, longer posts are not out of reach for smaller sites.
Have you published long-form posts on your blog? Have you noticed different results?
9 responses so far ↓
1 John Soares // Apr 17, 2014 at
High-quality long blog post Laura!
I left a comment on Carol Tice’s post about this. I think we’ll now see a lot of puffed up posts that just take more words to say the same thing, which is bad writing.
I also tend to write posts that are shorter and more tightly focused, so this is not good news for me.
2 Laura Spencer // Apr 17, 2014 at
Thanks John.
Sigh, that’s my fear too. I tried to really stress the importance of quality here. I hope that the readers don’t overlook that.
Personally, I can write either type of post. What I cannot do (if I want to stay in business) is write a longer-form post for the price of a shorter form post.
Anyway, I don’t think you’re totally out of luck with your shorter posts if you’re writing high-quality material that is useful to someone. There are cases when a shorter post can be as effective or even more effective.
3 Cathy Miller // Apr 18, 2014 at
I hate seeing a figure put to this. There are too many variables. In my niche, a lot of research is required and I often receive $300/post for 600-800 words. There is no way I would accept that for a 2,000+ word post.
I agree that compromise is the best route. Hire a professional for the occasional longer post. But know that the fee “depends” on the topic, length and research time.
4 Laura Spencer // Apr 18, 2014 at
Hi Cathy,
I think that’s one reason why Carol’s article called it a “floor” price. To me that means prices go up from there.
If a post requires a lot of extra effort, I would simply explain that and charge more.
5 Lori // Apr 18, 2014 at
Hi Laura! Nice discussion points.
I’m with John and Cathy on this one. Writing longer posts just because someone said it was a good idea is, well, a bad idea. I for one am sick to death of long posts that take forever (and use lots of large subheads and bold fonts) to say nothing new. Sales pages come to mind — I saw one in my email today that absolutely turned me off.
I don’t focus on post length. I focus on post quality. As writers, I believe that’s where our heads should be. The minute we start chasing the dollar, we lose sight of the goal. To my mind, quality writing is what allows you to rise to the top — not grabbing on to whatever trend happens to be passing by.
6 Laura Spencer // Apr 18, 2014 at
Hi Lori,
Thanks so much for your thoughtful comment.
I would agree with the emphasis on quality. A poorly done longer post is of no use to anyone. I do try to stress that here, but I’m sure some will miss my points on quality.
Unfortunately, the search engines seem to be focusing on length right now–feeding the current interest in longer posts.
7 Lori // Apr 18, 2014 at
That’s what concerns me about this whole notion of longer-is-better blogging, Laura. If we put the emphasis on what search engines want, we’re taking focus away from our main audience, which should be our readers.
Call me rebellious, but it’ll be the damn day I consider any search engine my primary audience. With the algorithms we have now, they’re trying to force that, aren’t they? And right there I see a problem. We’re ignoring user habits and wants and focusing on how to show up first on the search list.
I love that you’re making us talk, and think about this. 🙂
8 Laura Spencer // Apr 18, 2014 at
Lori,
I understand. Writers definitely need to meet the needs of their target audience first. If that means writing shorter posts instead of longer posts, then that’s what they need to do.
The posts I cite here are just two studies. I’d like to see more comprehensive studies, but I’m not sure if anyone has done that yet.
This definitely something writers need to discuss–with each other and but also with their clients.
9 Secrets You Need to Know About Writing Longer Blog Posts // Oct 31, 2014 at
[…] I explained in an earlier post, longer blog posts often attract more page views and social media attention. For that reason, many […]